Extraterrestrial detection inspired by firefly communications could distinguish alien signals from pulsars


Extraterrestrial detection inspired by firefly communications
A swarm of fireflies inspires a detection model for extraterrestrials. Credit: Siraphol Siricharattakul via vecteezy.com https://www.vecteezy.com/photo/69717168-glowing-fireflies-illuminate-serene-forest-at-sunset-creating-magical-atmosphere

When we think of extraterrestrial intelligence that might be out there among the stars, we tend to think of creatures not too unlike us, though maybe with gray skin, probably bald and with big black eyes. We focus on the familiar, humanoids. But there are many intelligent species on Earth that are nonhumanoid: dolphins, crows, pigs and—with swarm if not individual intelligence—ants and bees. The film “Arrival” conceived of hexapod beings more capable than humans and with a more sophisticated communication system.

Searches for extraterrestrial signals also mostly look for the currently familiar, primarily radio signals, the kind that we have been emitting for a hundred years. Since 2016, the Breakthrough Listen initiative has also been looking for optical laser transmissions.

Our transition to cable TV and the internet leaves Earth less “radio loud,” and any aliens might have gone through a similar short period of radio activity. This suggests “new paradigmatic frameworks could be necessary to recognize intelligent alien signals in astronomical data,” write a group of American scientists in the journal Scientific Reports.

Firefly flashes inspire an alien signal model

Making note of the Earth Species Project, where scientists are using machine learning to study animal communication, the researchers, from universities in the southwestern United States, developed a toy model—a simplified representation of a complex system designed to focus on the most essential features—of signal detectability inspired by fireflies.

In mating season, fireflies, also known as lightning bugs, glowworms, candle flies or fire beetles, produce sequences of flashes, usually during twilight, by the chemical process of bioluminescence produced from a specialized light-emitting organ located on their abdomens. Their purpose is mating, as flying males reveal themselves to females on the ground.

The flashing patterns can be altered in duration of luminescence, timing, color, the number and the rate of repetitions, the height of emission and the direction of flight. They vary by species as well as by geography.

The scientists, with lead author Cameron Brooks of Arizona State University, utilized a 2022 paper by Chantal Nguyen, and others, that investigated how firefly mating signals might co-evolve amidst the visual chaos of a swarm of fireflies, while maximizing the distinctiveness from other firefly species and limiting flashing to conserve energy. (Flashes require energy from the firefly and also pose a risk from predators.)

Standing out from nearby pulsars

The researchers developed a toy model that evolved an alien signal that is “maximally distinct from a background of highly ordered, naturally occurring signals generated by pulsars, while also minimizing energy consumption.”

Pulsars are highly magnetized, rapidly spinning neutron stars that produce bright, regular emissions in a highly periodic beam sweeping across space. There are an estimated 100,000 in the Milky Way galaxy, and, if the beam sweeps across the plane of Earth’s orbit, they are detectable by us.

These properties are what might be expected of the broadcasts of an alien intelligence. (In fact, when pulsars were discovered in 1967, their behavior was so odd it was speculated they might be broadcasts by extraterrestrials.) Any intelligent aliens looking to broadcast their location with a pulsed radio beam would presumably make an effort to be distinct from nearby pulsars.

However, the researchers’ model is not intended to search for literal firefly-like optical flashes, but instead for the more abstract structures of the signal pattern: the repetition period and pulse duration. Their toy model looked for patterns that minimized the weighted background signals of neighboring pulsars and minimized energy consumption (of the signalers, modeled as the fraction of time the signal stayed on). The model “evolved” to optimize the trade-off between signal properties and energy consumption.

Testing signals against a pulsar background

To test their model, Brooks and colleagues generated candidate signals by considering 3,724 pulsars from the Australia Telescope National Facility database. They binned the pulse profiles of the pulsars into “on” and “off” states, where a user picks a mean flux density as a cutoff; a profile greater than the cutoff is “1,” less than the cutoff “0.”

They simulated hypothetical alien signals by generating repeating radio-pulse patterns that were optimized to stand out from background natural pulsar signals, with a constraint to limit energy use.

Their main test used 158 pulsars located within five kiloparsecs (16,000 light-years) of Earth to create a natural background, with cutoffs in energy and a frequency of 1,400 megahertz. This frequency is close to the famous hydrogen emission line of 1,420 MHz (a wavelength of 21 cm). Because light at this frequency, a microwave, penetrates dust clouds, it is a favorite of astronomers and one any aliens might well use if they’re looking to broadcast their existence.

The model measured how closely each simulated signal matched the background pulsars while accounting for the different phase shifts of each incoming beam. (No two beams will overlap in the peaks and troughs of their wave cycles.) Optimization produced two signal structures: one when energy costs are ignored, and another shared by all the tested settings that include energy costs.

This study, a conceptual demonstration only, supports a strategy of detection-first: potentially artificial communication might stand out because of its relationship to surrounding signals, even when its content might be unintelligible to us. “This would complement, not replace, existing SETI methods,” the group writes.

Written for you by our author David Appell, edited by Sadie Harley, and fact-checked and reviewed by Robert Egan—this article is the result of careful human work. We rely on readers like you to keep independent science journalism alive.
If this reporting matters to you, please consider a donation (especially monthly). You’ll get an ad-free account as a thank-you.

Publication details

Cameron Brooks et al., A firefly-inspired model for detecting the alien, Scientific Reports (2026). DOI: 10.1038/s41598-026-67878-z

Key concepts

Search for extraterrestrial intelligence

Who’s behind this story?


David Appell

David Appell

David Appell is an Oregon-based freelance science writer whose work has appeared in Scientific American, New Scientist, Physics World, and The Washington Post. He holds a Ph.D. in physics from Stony Brook University.

Full profile →


Sadie Harley

Sadie Harley

BSc Life Sciences & Ecology. Microbiology lab background with pharmaceutical news experience in oil, gas, and renewable industries.

Full profile →


Robert Egan

Robert Egan

Bachelor’s in mathematical biology, Master’s in creative writing. Well-traveled with unique perspectives on science and language.

Full profile →

© 2026 Science X Network

Citation:
Extraterrestrial detection inspired by firefly communications could distinguish alien signals from pulsars (2026, October 30)
retrieved 30 October 2026
from https://phys.org/news/2026-10-extraterrestrial-firefly-communications-distinguish-alien.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.





Source link